<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: bigblobae &#8211; store big data blobs on AppEngine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/</link>
	<description>JavaFX, Rails and me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan</title>
		<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/comment-page-1/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jansterba.com/?p=43#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>@NotJim: I have not tried files larger than approx 3,5 megs. The implementation should be able to handle files of any size, but the issues comes in request processing time. Since the time your app can spend in one request is fairly limited, the limit of the datastore now transfers to the pipes between your app and the client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NotJim: I have not tried files larger than approx 3,5 megs. The implementation should be able to handle files of any size, but the issues comes in request processing time. Since the time your app can spend in one request is fairly limited, the limit of the datastore now transfers to the pipes between your app and the client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotJim</title>
		<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/comment-page-1/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>NotJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jansterba.com/?p=43#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Have you tried storing more than 10Mb with this approach? 
Google File Service had a similar implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Have you tried storing more than 10Mb with this approach? <br />
Google File Service had a similar implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/comment-page-1/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jansterba.com/?p=43#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>nvrmind my prev comment. it was the app engine bug. i added  and it solved it. thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nvrmind my prev comment. it was the app engine bug. i added  and it solved it. thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/comment-page-1/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jansterba.com/?p=43#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>This was great. 

I just downloaded and started to experiment. I&#039;m wondering will you support owned-to-many relationship in future?

I had Entity1 has many Entity2 which Entity2 has BigBlob type field. An exception was raised while trying to persist Entity1: &#039;Entity2 has multiple relationship fields of type org.honzasterba.bigblobae.BigBlob: thumb and image.  This is not yet supported&#039;. Or is this maybe app engine bug? 

Can you please point me?

thanks, 

evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was great. </p>
<p>I just downloaded and started to experiment. I&#8217;m wondering will you support owned-to-many relationship in future?</p>
<p>I had Entity1 has many Entity2 which Entity2 has BigBlob type field. An exception was raised while trying to persist Entity1: &#8216;Entity2 has multiple relationship fields of type org.honzasterba.bigblobae.BigBlob: thumb and image.  This is not yet supported&#8217;. Or is this maybe app engine bug? </p>
<p>Can you please point me?</p>
<p>thanks, </p>
<p>evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefanS</title>
		<link>http://jansterba.com/2010/bigblobae-store-big-data-blobs-on-appengine/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>StefanS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jansterba.com/?p=43#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Nice stuff!

You might be interested in this post:

http://blog.jteam.nl/2010/02/04/free-java-hosting-with-the-google-app-engine/

It covers some more &quot;workarounds&quot; for Google&#039;s app engine for Java.

-Stefan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice stuff!</p>
<p>You might be interested in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.jteam.nl/2010/02/04/free-java-hosting-with-the-google-app-engine/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.jteam.nl/2010/02/04/free-java-hosting-with-the-google-app-engine/</a></p>
<p>It covers some more &#8220;workarounds&#8221; for Google&#8217;s app engine for Java.</p>
<p>-Stefan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
